Awaiting reviewer selection after minor revision Instances of this decision are also rather rare. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. In the case of major revisions, the manuscript The manuscript is promising but needs major revisions and, in the judgment of the reviewer, may be unacceptable depending on the responses of the authors to the review. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. Minor Revision - A Minor revision should only be used for papers that have a clear contribution, and there are only small changes that need to be made to make the paper ready What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 2. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. At least one reviewer recommends “Accept after minor revision (no further review)”, and no “Reconsider (re-review) after major revision” or “Reject” is recommended. 2022. I submitted the revised manuscript after one-and-a-half months. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). This I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. The journal clearly said that the paper was accepted, subject to minor amendments and even went on to mention tentative publication dates. B. The suitability of the selected reviewers; The adequacy of reviewer comments and author response; The overall scientific quality of the paper. The reviewing process starts when editors send the paper to the first suitable reviewer, and ends when final review is complete. Unfortunately, some reviewers might reject to review the paper for various reasons. Is it common for a journal to reject a paper after previously accepting it? When a paper of mine was first reviewed, one of the reviewers was okay with the paper and the other one requested minor revisions. I made all the required amendments and submit again. When a paper receives a minor revision decision, it might not be sent for a second round of peer review; usually, the editor goes through the revisions and Sometimes, reviewers may become unavailable due to unforeseen circumstances, such as illness, heavy workload, or other commitments. Choose Major Revision if a paper has real potential, but a large component should be redone and re-reviewed. Should I reach out, or continue waiting? Thank your Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. So, let me first summarize the situation. If the initial revision was a minor revision, the status usually changes to ‘With Editor’ or ‘Decision in Progress’. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. Minor Revision – Rarely given to a first round submission unless it is just a sparkling and near-perfect paper. What to do for a The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. If you recommend acceptance, provide detail justifying However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. The one exception is that accepting a paper after just minor revisions (e. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. Minor Revision - A limited number of changes are required. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. I am I submitted an article to an emerald journal a month ago and 4 days back, I received a decision mail stating this, 'The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some minor revisions to your manuscript. In Manuscript Central, there were some changes of the paper’s status during the first two days, and as far as I can remember, these were Awaiting ADM Processing and Awaiting technical editor selection. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" after a month. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Accept with minor revisions: Also known as conditional acceptance, this decision means that the paper requires minor changes for it to be accepted. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". For the first round, I recieved a major revision and for the next two rounds, I received minor revisions. I made the revision and resubmitted in the last week of November 2020. Comments to Authors helps the authors improve their The result of the first round of peer review was ‘major revision’ and the result of the second round was ‘minor revision’ and all reviewers report form is “YES (x)” Currently, my revised manuscript is in the ‘Pending Decision (almost 3 days)’ As the second round was completed rapidly, I assumed the ‘Pending Decision’ would The reviewers will come up with comments and ultimately the editor may approve, reject, , or more commonly ask for revision (major/minor). Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. The article is not suitable for publication. I just thought after all reviewer scores, getting the editor decision I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. After making revisions according to the I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. After contacting Meaning of Awaiting Approval/Editing Checklist status after submitting for a minor revision I have submitted my paper after making the minor revisions. What does it mean when the reviewer says "the results are rather straightforward"? 0. So, I have edited it for clarity. If only one reviewer agrees to review and all the others After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point-by-point It is not uncommon for reviewers to have differing opinions and it is up to the Editor to make a final decision on your manuscript based on the reviewers’ opinions and the revisions you have made. Resubmitting a Manuscript to the Same Journal after Being Plainly Rejected. I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. 5. To request extensions for revisions. After a reviewer has been invited, the reviewer needs to accept/decline the invitation. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. Bottom line, it's all depends how well you respond to reviewer comments and how much reviewer and editor get satisfy with your revised version. The status stayed "with the editor" for around 4 months and suddenly, I get a rejection for my 9 November 2024. This change has occurred Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. A sudden change of status could also mean that the Associate Editor is facing challenges in I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Based on this, it may take about two-three weeks for this round of review and for the final decision. This change has occurred For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. The academic editor can select from the following options: accept in its current form, accept with minor revisions, reject and decline resubmission, reject but encourage resubmission, ask the author for Some aspects of your question were not clear. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and expertise). Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. Cite Fausto Alfredo Canales I had a revision decision, and after I submitted the revision, the status went to "Under review", and after about 4 weeks, it has now changed to "Awaiting reviewer scores". there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. 18 As a rule of thumb, minor revision leads to a quick acceptance, usually without sending the paper back to reviewers; however, this depends on how well the editor does his/her job and My case report, which was edited by Editage, received a minor revision request by a journal. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. However, I have heard nothing from the journal for 3 weeks, though I assumed I would receive a response in a few days. Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. " A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. Possible reasons for the need of a new reviewer could be After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers If the evaluations require major revisions and the paper has been The revision can be minor, moderate, or major, and this is usually indicated in the decision letter and/or the manuscript status in the submission system. If the paper was sent back for revision, the Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. Responding to Peer Reviewers. A minor revision is close to a contract to publish the paper if certain changes are made. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. It was rather an easy comment, so I resubmitted the case report after revision immediately. In case one happened before the other, that could help clarify the The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. From some previous posts I assume that such The response letter to the reviewer’ comments and the revised manuscript have been sent to the reviewer. Basics of Peer Review; Responding to Peer Reviewers; Tracking Your Submission. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. If indeed there is good evidence that the paper can be published after a relatively minor revision, With revised manuscripts, usually the reviewers from the previous round are selected. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 3. Usually, it is not a single reviewer, but several reviewers. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. If you intend for the reviewers to verify the revisions, you should NOT choose It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Network Questions Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. Choose 'Editor Center' and then click on 'Awaiting Referee Selection' C. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. Implies that the editors and reviewers feel the paper is publishable once their comments have been addressed. Paper under review a second time without After 5 months I received a "Major revision". My paper underwent a revision. Again, the two statuses occurring together is surprising. 03 - Submitted a revised version with 31 pages of revision comments. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. Then I revised and resubmitted. If the reviewer feels that ratings of novelty and importance will not improve even if the manuscript is adequately revised, the decision should be Reject, not Major Revision Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Get clarity on reviewer In that case, maybe it is not the policy of the journal to state clearly whether the submission will be sent out for review or not. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, although there is the option to add new reviewers (if additional input is needed), or drop some (for example, if they were entirely satisfied with the previous version). After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Kindly let me know what the above status message means. This change has occurred After that, if the reviewer accepts your revision, he/she will recommend your manuscript for publication by submitting his comment to editor confidentially while when he didn't accept your If accepted, the paper is sent to production. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. g. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". Now for the last • Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. Can I send a email to AE? A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). example of cover page for assignment; how to write a cover letter for delivery driver; to do or make a speech; what does assignment mean in education; explaining Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. However, If the required changes were very minimal (e. What does "Awaiting Assignment to Batch" mean? Hot Network Questions Help Locate Bathroom Vent Leak Entries in center but right-aligned in tabularray Does identity theory “solve” the hard problem of consciousness? But "minor revision" means "if you do the listed revisions, and they don't meaningfully change the content of the paper, it'll be accepted". Choose “Minor revision” If reviewers are no longer required and AE wants to QC some key revisions. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. Hi. My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. Reviewers On most of the Society’s journals, I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. revision again. This change has occurred At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". So we sent query to the editor. The submission is now with the author. The manuscript is publishable in its current form. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent back to the reviewers. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. What could be Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. In the second-round review after major revisions, as informed by the assistant editor, the reviewer agreed for the first and second-round reviews didn’t submit the second-round review report in a period of nearly two weeks, which is quite rare based on our experience. I for example look at my assignments once a week. When a revised paper is received: Minor changes will usually be assessed directly by the editor; If significant revisions were requested, the editor will usually return the manuscript to the original reviewers (unless they opted out of this) Rarely, the editor may invite comments from a new reviewer – the editor should explain why this fresh After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. after a 2nd revision) may not require any editorial summary. Note that the time it takes for an editor to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I want to know how long will this status last. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". At the third day, I saw Awaiting EE Decision which is still there. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". This change has occurred Review and selection of manuscripts. e. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Also, you seem to have brought up several points. Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but In the case of a Revision decision, it would also include your view of essential enhancements the authors must make or any other particular issues related to the paper. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. After six months, I received the reviews and was asked to do major revisions. 3. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. The editor may also decide that certain or all reviewers need not see the manuscript again, as their comments have been adequately addressed, or However, it was under review for 5 months. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. In the first notification, I got a major revision. However you can make it clear that the paper is likely to be accepted in the future. Role of the journal editor. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? I am not sure if the initial revision requested was a major revision or a minor revision. Among other reasons, this could be due to the field of study – perhaps it’s niche/super-specialized, interdisciplinary 2. Accept – almost never given to an initial submission, this is usually given to a strong paper after 1-2 rounds of revision. The AE will check if all the comments are addressed. Good Luck! I submitted my paper to a journal twelve days ago. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. How long do I need to wait to get the result? Thanks! The Journal response: Major revision -> minor revision "Revise for Editor Only'' -> reject. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author. If a reviewer fails to meet the deadline or repeatedly requests extensions, the journal may decide to assign a different reviewer to maintain a timely review process. It does not offer any value to the readers of IEEE Potentials or its subject is so thoroughly incoher- I have an experience of getting two minor revisions and finally article was rejected, othe other hand another article was accepted after major revision. The article contains a small number of easily correctable errors including grammar, missing ref-erences, and minor content clarification. A major revision was submitted to a journal. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. . Around the end of last year, the journal changed its chief editor who was responsible for my article. This means that the submission needs some minor work (as recommended by the reviewer) but that once it has been revised it will be accepted for publication. It has been three weeks since. In general, a paper is recommended for minor revision when all reviews are either accept or minor revision. We suggest 30 days for minor revisions and 90 days to resubmit for major revisions. I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under review to ensure that you have actually responded Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. and later got a decision of major revision. If the initial revision was a major revision, there may be another round of major/minor revision requested on resubmission. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. However, today, Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. My first round of review went well, with one reviewer only suggesting stylistic improvements Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): The journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors; Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): The journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes I submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne system. You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. I believe that I have adequately addressed the concerns raised by the Reviewer and made significant improvements to the manuscript. This change has occurred After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". 4. For It is not uncommon for a journal to invite new reviewers after a manuscript has been submitted with minor revisions. However, expect a slightly longer wait at this time of the year due to the approaching For manuscripts you don’t expect to see a revision. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 3. It is just guessing. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. In any case, the current status “With Editor” means that the editor is taking another look at your paper. Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 12 Publication dates: accepted date, version of record online, issue online – which one to use? Latest Articles. Revisions Authors who receive a decision of Minor Revision or Major Revision have 20, and 40 days, respectively, to resubmit the revised manuscript. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. When a manuscript is listed as "In reviewer agreement" in a journal's status, it means that the reviewer or reviewers who have been assigned to the manuscript are Dears I submitted a paper, after 4 months I received major revisions from 2 reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. All the reviewers overall appreciated the content and the usefulness, but also suggested corrections (varying from minor to As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. If AE would like to recommend for a minor revision when a manuscript still has a major For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. Is it a bad sign? I received a decision of ‘accept after minor revision’ for my submission to a Springer Nature journal. A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural Reviewers should not recommend citations of their own papers without sufficient explanation as to why the work is relevant; Be aware of any rapid or short reviews that recommend acceptance or minor revision without detail; You should also look out for duplicate reviews (i. This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is accepted. Your article has now received the minimum number of reviews required to make a decision. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. 4 Accept with Minor Revision. Then I received a reject letter from the new editor. Awaiting Reviewer Scores. So, there is a conflict between the two reviewers regarding the number Decision Types Accept - No further revision required. Q: How can I decide whether my suspicion is correct? What handling times I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. Then the status changed to “Decision in process”. 4) Not Suitable for Publication. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". Recruiting new reviewers to evaluate a 3) Minor Revision. reviewer selection system, making it more likely that you will be selected to review. The Editor will determine if additional input is needed from reviewers. One reviewer suggested to accepts it as is, the second didn't give a response. The majority of articles require revision before reaching this stage. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. What does ” awaiting reviewer selection ” mean under ” minor revision “? There is a contradiction in your statements. It is usual for a paper to go through at least two author revisions before acceptance. Minor revisions Major revisions It is very unusual for a paper to be accepted without needing any revisions. Is Is it normal to have the status "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" pop up a day or two after submitting a minor revision? My understanding was that once a minor revision was submitted the paper would not go out for further peer-review? This is a journal using the ScholarOne system. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. " Does it mean that my paper will go through The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). มีข้อแก้ไขเล็กน้อย (minor revisionหรือ revision required) บรรณาธิการแจ้งผลหลังจาก ผู้ประเมินพิจารณาบทความเรียบร้อยแล้ว (ประมาณ 1 – 2 เดือน) 3. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting . Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Editorial policies or practices: I recently received the reviews/comments for an article submitted few months back to a journal. The five allowable Editorial decisions are: You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. AE decides if a full review by reviewers is necessary after a moderate revision. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. , choice of language, punctuation), it is likely that the editor will make the final decision. Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. The Editor will take into The third reviewer did not provide any comments but gave 9 suggestions. In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. The editor, considering the reviewers' comments and their own thoughts, provided 12 suggestions and believed that the paper could be accepted after minor revisions. ’ My article was submitted to a journal last year and has undergone three rounds of reviews. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Awaiting Editor Decision. similar reviews from two different accounts for the same manuscript) What happens when you receive the decision letter? After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Positive review from an additional (third) reviewer (endorsing the 2nd reviewer) against a negative review from the 1st reviewer. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. Should I wait for them or write to them? Please suggest. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. In most cases, the revised manuscript will be re-assigned to the original Editor. For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. 04 - Accepted directly. Also, ‘SAE’ perhaps stands for ‘Specialist Associate Editor. Comments: You seem to have received comments from two reviewers, one for a minor revision and the other for a major revision. The status of the paper changed several times. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. What can this mean? The platform is are invited to revise and resubmit your article (see decision notification e-mails and what they mean, below). Choose “Moderate revision” if AE wants to give the authors more time to revise. if the manuscript needs to be sent After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. There are three basic types like what @Eppicurt said, it's hard to tell without knowing the details, but if after the first round of review, the verdict is "minor revision", and you've done what the reviewers suggested, then I would say it has a good chance of being accepted (this is from my own experience both as author and reviewer, but NOT in biology field), worst case you probably I submitted my manuscript to a journal. It was updated to ‘Under Review’ on December 10, 2020, and has remained so till date. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. Pub-Express I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. Sample reviewer comments: One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. This change Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. You can register for free here: Peer Review Excellence. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. One of the 3 reviewers asked to add a future research direction section. " Does this I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. Preprint got published on Authorea without sending it to review (desk rejection). Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days The process of reviewer selection in S1M is quite straightforward. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? The letter shows that the reviewers "have asked for some other minor revisions". The Editor will take into I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Thank you. After It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". The editor sent the manuscript to a third reviewer who suggested rejection with very negative comments in everything. We have our manuscript reviewed by journal Forests. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision".
rgwu penyw fkiijfd lwxds czfutii ekxpi cxcfu kyvtk kmuj opgom